Cases
From Suffolk IP Licensing
Contents |
[edit]
Edited Cases
- Adobe Systems, Inc. v. One Stop Micro, Inc., 84 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (N.D. Cal 2000)
- American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, 60 F.3d 913 (2d Cir. 1994) (Fair use doctrine)
- Arizona Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark International, 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005)
- Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257 (1979)
- Brulotte v. Thys, 379 U.S.29 (1965)
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, 510 U.S. 569 (1994)
- Central Point Software, Inc. v. Global Software & Accessories, Inc., 880 F. Supp. 957 (E.D.N.Y. 1995)
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 730 (1989) (copyright owned by contractor if not an employee)
- DSC Communications Corp. v. Pulse Communications, 170 F.3d 1354 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
- I.Lan Systems, Inc. v. Netscout Service Level Corp., 183 F.Supp.2d 328 (D. Mass. Jan. 2, 2002) (Massachusetts shrink-wrap case)
- Intel Corp. v. ULSI System Technology, Inc., 995 F.2d 1566 (Fed. Cir. 1993)
- Kelly v. Arriba Soft, 336 F.3d 811, (9th. Cir. 2003), modifying Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp., 280 F.3d 934 (9th. Cir. 2001) (use of "thumbnail" images was fair use).
- Lasercomb America, Inc. v. Reynolds, 911 F.2d 970 (4th Cir. 1990)
- Lear v. Adkins, 35 U.S. 653 (1969)
- Lexmark International v. Static Control Components, 253 F.Supp.2d 943 (E.D.Ky. 2003) (use of copyright act, DMCA, to restrict interoperable printer cartridges)
- Lexmark International v. Static Control Components, 387 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 2004)
- Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (single use notice)
- Micro Star v. Formgen, 154 F.3d 1107 (9th Cir. 1997)
- Microsoft Corp. v. Harmony Computers & Electronics, Inc., 846 F. Supp. 208 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)
- Morrissey v. Procter & Gamble, 379 F.2d 675 (1st Cir. 1967)
- Morton Salt Co. v. G.S. Suppiger Co., 314 U.S. 488 (1942)
- New York Times v. Tasini, 121 S.Ct. 2381 (June 25, 2001) (New York Times freelancer case)
- S.O.S. v. Payday, 886 F.2d 1081 (9th Cir. 1989) (federal preemption discussed in context of licensing case)
- Scheiber v. Dolby Labs., Inc., 293 F.3d 1014 (7th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 71 U.S.L.W. 3471 (2003).
- Spitzer-McAfee Case.
- USM Corp. V. SPS Technologies, Inc., 694 F.2d 505 (7th Cir. 1982)
- Xu Liu vs. Price Waterhouse LLP, 302 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 2002)
[edit]
Cases with links
- Alcatel USA v. DGI Technologies, 166 F.3d 772, 49 U.S.P.Q.2d 1641 (5th Cir. 1999)
- Advent Systems v. Unisys, 925 F.2d 670 (3d Cir. 1991)
- Allen Archery, Inc. v. Precision Shooting Equipment, Inc., 865 F.2d 896 (7th Cir. 1989)
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 35 F.3d 1435 (9th Cir. 1994)
- Baker v. Selden, 101 U. S. 99 (1880)
- Boosey & Hawkes Music Publishers Ltd. v. The Walt Disney Co., 145 F.3d 481 (2d Cir. 1998)
- Bowers v. Baystate Technologies, 320 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 2003);
- C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing v. Major League Baseball Advanced Media, 505 F.3d 818 (8th Cir. 2007)
- Chemtron v. Aqua Products, 830 F. Supp. 314 (E.D. Va. 1993)
- Chodos v. West Publishing Company, Inc., 292 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 2002)
- Computer Associates v. State Street Bank, 789 F. Supp. 470 (D. Mass. 1992) (interpretation of various terms of art)
- Computer Communciations, Inc. v. Codex Corp.
- Cyrix Corp. v. Intel Corp., 77 F.3d 1381 (Fed. Cir. 1996)
- Data Processing Services, Inc. v. L. H. Smith Oil Corp., 492 N.E.2d 314 (Ind. App. 1986)
- De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United States, 273 U.S. 236 (1927)
- Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980)
- Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981)
- Donald F. Duncan, Inc. v. Royal Tops Manufacturing Co., Inc., 343 F.2d 655 (7th Cir. 1965)
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U. S. 340 (1991)
- Gardner v. Nike, 279 F.3d 774 (9th Cir. 2002) (exclusive copyright license is not assignable without consent)
- Gill v. United States
- Gilmer v. Buena Vista, 939 F. Supp. 665 (W.D. Ark. 1996)
- Graham v. John Deere, 383 U.S. 1 (1966)
- Hyperlaw v. West, 158 F.3d 693 (2d Cir. 1998), cert denied, 522 U.S. 3732 (1999)
- In re Bergy
- In re Claremont Acquisition Corporation, Inc.
- In re Cybernetic Services, Inc., 252 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2001)
- In re Patient Education Media, Inc.
- In re Pioneer Ford Sales, Inc.
- IBM v. United States, 298 U.S. 131 (1936) (punch-card case)
- Institut Pasteur v. Cambridge Biotech Corp., 104 F.3d 489 (1st Cir. 1977)
- Kellogg Company v. National Biscuit Company, 305 U.S. 111 (1938)
- Kennedy v. National Juvenile Detention Association, 187 F.3d 690 (7th Cir. 1999)
- Kennedy v. Guess, Inc., 806 N.E.2d 776 (Ind. 2004)
- Kepner-Tregoe, Inc. v. Vroom, 186 F.3d 283 (2d Cir. 1999)
- Kewanne Oil v. Bicron, 416 U. S. 470 (1974)
- Kodak v. Image Technical Services, 504 U.S. 451 (1992)
- Leegin Creative v. PSKS, 551 U.S. 877 (2007) (Minimum resale price not a per se violation)
- Lubrizol v. Richmond, 756 F.2d 1043 (4th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1057 (1985))
- Loew's Inc. v. Wolff, 101 F. Supp. 981 (S.D. Cal. 1951)
- M.A. Mortenson Company v. Timberline Software, 998 P.2d 305 (Wash. 2000)
- McElmurry v. Arkansas Power & Light Company
- McRoberts Software v. Media 100, 329 F.3d 557 (7th Cir. 2003)
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios v. Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005)
- Microsoft v. AT&T, 127 S. Ct. 1746 (2007)
- O'Reilly v. Morse, 56 U.S. 62 (1853)
- ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996)
- Random House v. Rosetta Books, LLC, 150 F. Supp. 2d 613(S.D.N.Y 2002), aff'd, 283 F.3d 490 (2d Cir. 2002)
- Sony v. Universal Studios, 464 U.S. 417 (1984)
- Sprecht v. Netscape Communication Corp., 206 F. 3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002)
- State Oil v. Kahn, 522 U.S. 3 (1997) (Maximum resale price restriction not a per se violation)
- State Street Bank v. Signature Financial Group, 149 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 142 L.Ed.2d 704 (1999)
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle M.B.H. v. Hercules Inc., 105 F.3d 629 (Fed. Cir. 1997)
- Sun Microsystems v. Microsoft, 188 F. 3d 1115 (9th Cir. 1999) (license condition vs. covenant; remedy available)
- Troxel Manufacturing v. Schwinn Bicycle, 465 F.2d 1253 (6th Cir. 1972);
- Teleflex, Inc., et al. v. KSR International Co., 04-1152 (Fed. Cir. 2005), cert. granted, No. 04-1350, June 26, 2006 (re-examination of method of determining whether prior art exists).
- Trademark Cases, 100 U.S. 82 (1887)
- U.S. Drug Co. v. Theodore Rectanus, 248 U.S. 90 (1918)
- Unted States v. Inslaw, Inc.
- Video Pipeline v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, 342 F.3d 191 (3rd. Cir. 2003) (use of video clips)
- Western Electric v. Pacent Reproducer, 42 F.2d 116 (2d Cir. 1930)
- Willemijn Houdstermaatschappij, BV v. Standard Microsystems Corp., 925 F. Supp. 193(S.D.N.Y 1996)
- Zenith Radio v. Hazeltine Research, 395 U.S. 100 (1969)
[edit]
Cases without links
- Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Tridentair Helicopters, Inc., 982 F. Supp. 318 (D. Del. 1997)
- Computer Associates, Inc. v. State Street Bank, 789 F. Supp. 470 (D. Mass. 1992) (interpretation of various terms of art)
- DSC Communications Corp. v. DGI Technologies, Inc., 81 F.3d 597, 38 U.S.P.Q.2d 1699 (5th Cir. 1996)
- Eickmeyer v. Commissioner, 580 F.2d 395 (10th Cir. 1978))
- Fawick v. Commissioner, 436 F.2d 655 (6th Cir. 1971))
- Hill v. Gateway 200, Inc., 105 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 47 (1997)
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M& M Produce Farm & Sales, 335 F.3d 130 (2d Cir. 2003)
- In re 199Z, Inc., 137 B.R. 778 (C.D. Ca. 1992)
- In re Avalon Software, Inc., 209 B.R. 517 (Bankr. D. Ariz 1997)
- In Re Catapult Entertainment, Inc. v. Catapult Entertainment, Inc., 165 F.3d 747 (9th Cir. 1999)
- In re Cybernetic Services, Inc., 252 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2001)
- In re Peregrine Entertainment, 116 B.R. 194 (C.D. Cal. 1990)
- In Re Prize Frize Inc., 27 U.S.P.Q.2d 1780 (9th Cir. 1994)
- In re World Auxiliary Power Co., 303 F.3d 1120 (9th Cir. 2002)
- Kueneman v. Commissioner, 628 F.2d 1196 (9th Cir. 1980))
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Mfg. Co., 243 U.S. 502, 515 (1917)
- Ole K. Nilssen v. Motorola, Inc., 963 F. Supp. 664 (N.D. Ill. 1997)
- Practice Management Information Corp. v. American Medical Association Shows, 43 U.S.P.Q. 2d 164 (9th Cir. 1997);
- Register.com v. Verio, Inc., 356 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2004)
- Rhone-Poulenc Agro v. DeKalb Genetics Corp v. Monsanto Co., 271 F.3d 1081 (Fed. Cir. 2001) (assignment of license agreement; bona fide purchaser issue) text@590
- PPG Industries v. Guardian Industries, 597 F.2d 1090 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 930 (assignment of license rights via merger)
- Saturday Evening Post v. Rumbleseat Press, 816 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1972); and
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Mfg. Co., 326 U.S. 249 (1945)
- United States v. General Electric Co., 272 U.S. 476 (1926) (fixing resale price not per se violation under true consignment sales)
- Verson Corp. v. Verson International Group PLC, 899 F. Supp. 358 (N.D. Ill. 1995) (sublicense vs. assignment) text@600
[edit]
Statutes
- California Civil Code Section 987
- Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13; Discrimination in price, services, or facilities
- Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 14; Sale, etc., on agreement not to use goods of competitor
- Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“E-Sign”), 15 U.S.C. § 7001-7031.
- Internal Revenue Code Section 1221, 1231 (Special rule disallowing capital gain treatment for creator of copyright)
- Patent Cooperation Treaty
- Patent Clause of the US Constitution
- Restatement of the Law, Second, Torts, § 652 (right of publicity)
- U.S. Bankruptcy Code Section 365(n)
- Selected Lanham Act Sections; see also Madrid Treaty
- Selected Sections of the Copyright Act (17 USC 101, 106, 107, 201, 204, 301, 1201)
- Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works
- Selected Sections of the Patent Act (35 U.S.C. 100-103, 261, 271)
- Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1; Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty
- Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2; Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty
- UCC Sections referenced in ProCD (Sections 2-204, 2-206 and 2-207) (these are the Massachusetts analogs, rather than the actual sections, but they should be substantially similar)
- Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, 17 U.S.C. § 106A
- Uniform Electronic Transactions Act (“UETA”), enacted in Massachusetts as [M.G.L. ch 110G]
- Uniform Trade Secret Act
[edit]
EU Directives
- EU Directive 91/250/EEC 14 May 1991 (legal protection of computer software, including right to reverse engineer)
- EU Directive 95/46/EC 24 October 1995 part 1 and EU Directive 95/46/EC 24 October 1995 part 2 (protection of personal information)
- EU Directive 96/9/EC 11 March 1996 (legal protection of databases)
- EU Directive 98/71/EC 13 October 1998 (design rights)
